Get the Best IPTV Service
Last movie you seen & rate it ? | Page 62 | Techkings
What's new
By:
Filters

Last movie you seen & rate it ?

NEW BOND

i fell alseep half way through this

felt like it was hastily re-written, and indeed it has 5 writers credited which is apparent when watching it - - there were that many anodyne bond cliches popping in and out of the movie, maybe they got to write a character each.

some truly terrible acting performances too. the mr robot actor playing one of the main villains is your bog-standard, staring into the distance facially disfigured, looking-like-a-my-chemical-romance-fanboy, island owning mega-lo-manic. and he actuallty looks as bored as the audience. the comic lip-quivver reaction of Q to the end of the film is panto-season ham, and the new 007 would be more at home playing a market stall owner in eastenders than an operative in a sophisticated intelligence agency. imagine danny dyer being let loose playing sherlock homes and you are close to how bad she is.

as the awful plot slugs its interminable way through the TWO HOURS AND FORTY MINUTES! of the film, it of course has all the usual boring mcguffins, unintended comedy and plot holes.

people say there cannot be a black or female bond as the character is white and Oxbridge educated in times when only white men were recruited. ok, dr realism - how about smart blood that allows you to be tracked by and able to speak to people miles away or an EMP watch that disables all electrical devices near by except the ear piece in bond's ear.

boring, boring, boring.
 
The Many Saints of Newark.

did not finish this

take a series brimming with style humour and character development.

remove all those things, leaving just some inane in jokes

then cut to a new scene every couple of minutes.
 
teddybloat said:
NEW BOND

i fell alseep half way through this

felt like it was hastily re-written, and indeed it has 5 writers credited which is apparent when watching it - - there were that many anodyne bond cliches popping in and out of the movie, maybe they got to write a character each.

some truly terrible acting performances too. the mr robot actor playing one of the main villains is your bog-standard, staring into the distance facially disfigured, looking-like-a-my-chemical-romance-fanboy, island owning mega-lo-manic. and he actuallty looks as bored as the audience. the comic lip-quivver reaction of Q to the end of the film is panto-season ham, and the new 007 would be more at home playing a market stall owner in eastenders than an operative in a sophisticated intelligence agency. imagine danny dyer being let loose playing sherlock homes and you are close to how bad she is.

as the awful plot slugs its interminable way through the TWO HOURS AND FORTY MINUTES! of the film, it of course has all the usual boring mcguffins, unintended comedy and plot holes.

people say there cannot be a black or female bond as the character is white and Oxbridge educated in times when only white men were recruited. ok, dr realism - how about smart blood that allows you to be tracked by and able to speak to people miles away or an EMP watch that disables all electrical devices near by except the ear piece in bond's ear.

boring, boring, boring.
Click to expand...

Craig was always a weak bond tbf. Couldn't hold a candle to Moore and, connery.

Personally think edris Elba would be an awesome bond. He's cool and would embrace the character completely.
 
channelking said:
Craig was always a weak bond tbf. Couldn't hold a candle to Moore and, connery.

Personally think edris Elba would be an awesome bond. He's cool and would embrace the character completely.
Click to expand...
Roger Moore, played bond, with such campness & innuendos, he was funny to watch. I also enjoyed the darkness Daniel Craig, brought to the character. Replacement - Tom Hardy or Gérard Butler.
 
stuss said:
Roger Moore, played bond, with such campness & innuendos, he was funny to watch. I also enjoyed the darkness Daniel Craig, brought to the character. Replacement - Tom Hardy or Gérard Butler.
Click to expand...

Ye Moore was a special in that role mate. Thought connery was great also.

Never got into Craig as bond just didn't fit imo.

Ye forgot about Hardy he would be a top bond character.
 
I thought Craig was good in the role, he was supposed to freshen up the franchise and bring it up to date for the 21st century, I think he did that well, his first film, Casino Royale, I thought was good, 2nd one Quantum of solace, not so good, but he redeemed himself with Skyfall and Spectre, havent seen the latest yet, Connery and Moore will always be remembered as the main 2 bonds, but for me Craig is pretty close to them, Dalton was poor in the role , Brosnan wasnt much better, I did like George Lazenbys only outing though, thought that movie wasnt bad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

cactikid
W10 Opera Browser and YouTube issue
Replies
4
Views
215
jaymac
jaymac
userlee5267
Lazy beagle
Replies
17
Views
1K
RebeccaWins
R
N
Best time to take trials?
Replies
10
Views
422
naughty_dad2
N
loncell
Bookies and restrictions
Replies
6
Views
245
loncell
loncell
Joe516
The 2024 Premier League Darts Schedule
2 3 4
Replies
65
Views
4K
rs500nutter
rs500nutter
Back
Top
Flash Sale Popup